Salma Ewing vs Maddy Zampardo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 07:01 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Ewing vs M. Zampardo

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ewing 2 - 0 Zampardo
They have played 5 sets in total, with Salma Ewing winning 4 and Maddy Zampardo winning 1. The last match between Salma Ewing and Maddy Zampardo was at the W35 Decatur, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Salma Ewing getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Ewing | 2 |
Zampardo | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Decatur(06-11-25)
(Q3) W50 Pelham(05-20-25)
S. Ewing vs M. Zampardo H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
57.61% (106-78) | Career Total W/L | 38.46% (5-8) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Titles | 0 |
2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Ewing vs M. Zampardo Match Preview:
- Ewing has shown superior performance on their second serve recently, winning 42.57% of points compared to Zampardo's 34.31%. Could this be a deciding factor? Perhaps.
- In return games, Ewing has been more effective against opponents' second serves, with a 48.12% win rate versus Zampardo's 45.39%.
- Both players perform similarly in returning first serves, with Zampardo slightly edging out Ewing with 33.33% compared to Ewing's 32.96%.
- Ewing has been slightly better under pressure, saving 45.9% of breakpoints compared to Zampardo's 42.59%, a useful stat for in-match scenarios.
- In the past year, Zampardo has a higher overall win percentage at 55.56%, although Ewing has played a significantly larger number of matches.
- Both players prefer hard courts, with Ewing having a 60% win rate and Zampardo an impressive 100%, although Zampardo's sample size is much smaller.
- Ewing boasts the advantage in direct head-to-head matches, leading with a 1-0 record against Zampardo. How crucial is this in predicting their next encounter? History often repeats itself.
- Match duration between these players averages over two hours, indicating closely contested matches.
- In deciding sets, Ewing has a 27% success rate in the past year, while Zampardo has struggled, winning none in such scenarios.
- Ewing has faced stronger competition, with opponents having an average rank of 372.09 compared to Zampardo's 576.89.
- Both players are nearly identical in breakpoint conversion, with Ewing converting 34.4% and Zampardo 33.33%. This might not heavily sway the match.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performances, it appears that Ewing has the edge in their upcoming match. Their higher second serve point win percentage and ability to handle matches under pressure provide significant advantages.
Their past head-to-head record also favors Ewing, along with stronger competition faced over the last year. Although Zampardo shows excellent results on hard surfaces, Ewing's history and metrics suggest a likely victory.
Consequently, based on the current data available, Ewing is the favorite to win this upcoming encounter.
Salma Ewing vs Maddy Zampardo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Ewing vs M. Zampardo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
26 | Games Won | 16 |
6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
8 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
1:54:41 | Average Match Time | 1:54:41 |
57% (71/124) | 1st Serve % | 52% (64/123) |
69% (49/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (40/64) |
51% (27/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (22/59) |
47% (9/19) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (5/12) |
50% (61/123) | Return Points Win % | 39% (48/124) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Ewing Recent Matches Played
M. Zampardo Recent Matches Played

S. Ewing vs M. Zampardo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
57.61% (106/78) | YTD Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
56.67% (242/185) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.83% (13/16) |
53.83% (2086/1789) | Games Win/Loss | 46.83% (118/134) |
59.03% (85/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
53.85% (21/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
203 | Aces Total | 25 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
422 | Total Double Faults | 47 |
1:7:33 | Average Match Time | 1:23:45 |
412.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.62 |
57% (4203/7342) | 1st Serve % | 54% (345/640) |
63% (2628/4203) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (210/345) |
46% (1437/3139) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (128/295) |
48% (450/940) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (30/68) |
47% (3351/7183) | Return Points Win % | 42% (276/661) |
50.00% (50/50) | Challenger W/L | 38.46% (5/8) |
66.67% (56/28) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
59% (106/181) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (5/13) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
26% (8/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
52% (30/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/3) |
82% (114/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 63% (8/5) |
18% (114/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 38% (8/3) |
19% (70/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (5/0) |